Bridging the (Roster) Gaps: Sign Dunn, Garland, Abreu; Trade LaRoche, McLouth
Adam Dunn - DavidMyersPhotos/Flickr.com
Yesterday, Nick talked about several young free agents the Pirates could consider signing in an effort to supplement the core of their current roster. Today, I'll look at a few of the more expensive options Neal Huntington could pursue.
These free agent signings aren't at all likely. If baseball were played in a spreadsheet, though, the Pirates would be better off with these players than without them.
Adam Dunn
In my opinion, to court a player in Dunn's mold, the Pirates would first need to clear a position for him. The 2009 outfield features plenty of names to sort through already: Start with Andrew McCutchen, Nate McLouth and Brandon Moss, and squeeze in playing time for Steve Pearce and Nyjer Morgan. For now, let's leave that group intact.
We've heard earlier in the hot stove league that inquiries have been made regarding Adam LaRoche's availability. For the sake of this post, let's assume that Mark Teixeira signs in Boston or Washington and that the Los Angeles Angels are in need of a first baseman. Huntington trades LaRoche to L.A. in exchange for Mark Trumbo and a lower-level starting pitcher. It's not the huge return which Che is known to expect.
With first base open, Huntington then signs Adam Dunn to a five-year, $65 million contract. Dunn, 29, sports a career .247/.381/.518 batting line with a .984 fielding percentage in 127 games played at first base. I'll stay away from my Lefty McThump soapbox, only stepping up long enough to say that Dunn's power and the close proximity of Clemente's Wall to home plate at PNC Park would be a welcome combination.
Dunn's similar batters through age 28 include Darryl Strawberry, Jose Canseco, Harmon Killebrew, Rocky Colavito and Reggie Jackson. At age 33, all save Colavito were still producing above league-average levels. (In fact, Killebrew's age 33 season was the best of his Hall of Fame career.) It's a dirty estimate, but you could probably expect Dunn to produce throughout the length of the above-market contract that it would take to get him to come to Pittsburgh.
Jon Garland
On July 31, 2003, Jeff Suppan was traded by the Pirates to the Boston Red Sox for Mike Gonzalez and Freddy Sanchez.
To that point in his career -- 2003 was his age 28 season -- Suppan had pitched only one half of a year in the National League. He had made 194 appearances (mostly starts) with the Red Sox and Kansas City Royals and had the reputation of being an average, durable starting pitcher.
He reached free agency at an inopportune time, though; the 2002-2003 offseason was the winter of collusion. With ownership allegedly conspiring against players, Suppan found only a one-year contract with a $4 million option for the next season on the table. He signed with the Pirates and went 10-7 with a 3.57 ERA in 21 starts before being dealt away at the deadline.
Mike Gonzalez and Freddy Sanchez went on to have solid careers with the Pirates. Half a year of Suppan was spun into 3.5 years of lights-out left-handed relief, two years (and counting) of strong first base play and four years (and counting) of a .300-hitting infielder.
What does that have to do with Jon Garland?
Through his age 28 season, Garland has a 4.47 ERA in 1625 innings spent as an average, durable starter in the American League. His next pitch in the National League will be his first. He's also a free agent in a bad economy, and his high-dollar offers are likely few and far between.
Huntington signs Garland to a one-year, $15 million contract with an option for 2010. Garland provides the stabilizing veteran presence in the rotation that the Pirates have interest in acquiring. He's only here for April, May, June and July, though. After fooling National League batters for half a season, he's traded at the deadline to a contender in need of a hired gun, and in return the Pirates receive more minor-league depth.
Let's say that for the sake of symmetry the Red Sox are the team that comes calling on July 31, and Garland is traded straight-up for Ryan Westmoreland.
Bobby Abreu
Unlike Dunn and Garland, Abreu isn't still in the peak of his career. At 34, he's likely looking for one more big contract. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem likely that he'll find that this winter.
As was the case with Dunn, to sign a player like Bobby Abreu, Huntington would first need to clear a spot in the starting lineup. As much as I like Nate McLouth, it seems as if he may be difficult to extend -- and there's still the question of whether his 2008 was a fluke or not.
Huntington returns Frank Wren's phone call, and McLouth is sent south to the Atlanta Braves in exchange for a three-prospect package centered around Cole Rohrbough or Jeff Locke. The trade would be a bargain, but the Pirates would be looking to cash in later in the year.
With right field now open -- McCutchen plays center, with Moss in left -- Abreu signs a one-year, $20 million contract. Huntington has the option of trading him at the deadline or offering arbitration at season's end and earning draft picks as compensation for losing a Type A free agent. (Abreu would be expected to decline arbitration as he would be in search of one last multi-year deal -- the one he would've received this off-season in a better economy.)
Conclusion
In trading LaRoche and McLouth -- and ideally, Ryan Doumit, Jack Wilson, Freddy Sanchez and John Grabow, but that's another post -- Huntington clears enough payroll to make taking on big contracts manageable in the short term. (In 2010, payroll would drop substantially, as only Dunn would still be on the books.)
He exploits the market, as Ian Leyda of Zelienople has suggested.
The ledger would look like:
OUT: Adam LaRoche, Nate McLouth, $50 million or so in 2009
IN: Adam Dunn, Mark Trumbo, Ryan Westmoreland, Cole Rohrbough, three risk-reward low-level prospects, two extra 2010 draft picks
The lineup for 2009:
1. McCutchen, CF
2. Abreu, RF
3. Sanchez, 2B
4. Dunn, 1B
5. Doumit, C
6. LaRoche, 3B
7. Moss, LF
8. Wilson, SS
9. Pitcher
With a starting rotation of:
1. Garland, R
2. Maholm, L
3. Snell, R
4. Gorzelanny, L
5. Ohlendorf, R (and many others)
And a restocked minor-league system, too.
Discussion
12 Comments on "Bridging the (Roster) Gaps: Sign Dunn, Garland, Abreu; Trade LaRoche, McLouth"
#1
Posted by Cory Humes, December 20, 2008 3:09 PM
The dollar figures may be exaggerated. Consider all free agent deals to be "whatever it takes to get him to Pittsburgh." Money is no object in this case -- the short-term hit is made up for in 2010 and 2011 as the majority of the 25-man roster is making near the major-league minimum.
#2
Posted by Gerry, December 20, 2008 4:03 PM
Very well thought out, with an eye to a good 2009 and the future.
Since you brought it up, and as the Red Sox need catching now, what would work between the Bucs and the Sox as in Doumit for . . . . ?
#3
Posted by Cory Humes in reply to comment from Gerry, December 20, 2008 4:10 PM
Thanks, Gerry.
I wrote about trading Doumit earlier this week as part of a series of posts looking at the Pirates' catching situation.
I talked with Evan a little about this, and we came up with maybe Ryan Kalish or Yamaico Navarro in exchange for Doumit. I asked about Josh Reddick, but Evan thought that was pushing it.
In general, the Pirates should be looking for young, high-upside talent (even if that means taking on some risk).
#4
Posted by Matthew, December 20, 2008 6:17 PM
Where do I sign up?
I have thought about the Dunn signing too and would love to see him hitting in a Bucs uniform, especially in Pittsburgh. A potential 50 homer season would be nice to see!
#5
Posted by john holland in reply to comment from Cory Humes, December 20, 2008 9:49 PM
Cory,
I do like that starting 2009 pitching rotation for the pirates with garland at the top. (And it is not all that far fetched !! ) Garland would be a nice # 1 ! The line up however you can't afford Abreu (hell they dont even want to extend MClouth ) and he would bat third behind Sanchez not second in front of Sanchez! But this organization did give Kendall $10 million a year, traded for Matt Morris making him the highest paid last season, and a couple years ago paid fat beer bellied Burnitz Five million a year ! who know :) your rotation would be good though !
#6
Posted by john holland in reply to comment from Cory Humes, December 20, 2008 9:52 PM
Cory,
Why would you trade Mclouth are you insane ? Everytome the Pirates get a good young player (once in a blue moon ) everyone including you Cory wants to trade him wake up ! john
#7
Posted by Joe, December 21, 2008 10:11 AM
Um...Wow, where do I start. First of all, none of these guys are going to sign one year deals, no chance, especially not with the Pirates. Secondly, if the market is so dried up that these guys are willing to sign with the Pirates, other teams are not going to come calling with top prospects at the trading deadline for them.
I dont mind trading McLouth and LaRoche though. People seem to forget that McLouth was less than good after the All Star break,so essentially we have seen one good half of a season from him, and nothing he did in the minors suggest he will keep it up, so selling high on McLouth wouldnt be the worst idea. That doesnt mean I dont think McLouth wont become a bonified star, I just dont think it's likely.
#8
Posted by Cory Humes in reply to comment from john holland, December 21, 2008 11:26 AM
John,
You can't have it both ways -- last thread, you wanted to sign Juan Rivera. If you want to go after a free agent, that necessitates a trade to clear playing time.
All else equal, I hope Nate McLouth is the player we saw in 2008. That's a big risk for a team to take, though, especially given the reported gap between McLouth's self-worth and what the Pirates are willing to pay him in an extension. (Give him a contract now and you'll see how Jack Wilson ended up with $7-8m per year.) This might be selling at his high point. Let's talk next October?
You need to put the Pirates' history out of mind. Nothing that happened before last winter matters, and Neal Huntington, ownership, etc. wasn't responsible for it. If you want the Pirates to contend again, then you need to have patience and understand that rebuilding needs to occur in a certain way. Unpopular trades will be made.
#9
Posted by Cory Humes in reply to comment from Joe, December 21, 2008 11:32 AM
Joe,
I started off by saying that these deals aren't realistic -- I agree with you. However, the last time the market was like this, the Pirates ended up with Kenny Lofton, Reggie Sanders, Jeff Suppan, etc., all well below their actual value. I think we'll see in another month or two just how much the economy has affected MLB.
In no trade did I ask for a top prospect. These guys (Trumbo, Westmoreland, Rohrbough) are all a cut below their organizations' elite -- call them Grade B guys. The trades might be the most realistic part of the post.
Finally, as for FAs signing one-year deals: Guys will be looking to cash in on one big season this year so they can get their multi-year deals next winter in a better environment. Sabathia, Teixeira, etc. aren't affected, but guys like Abreu and Dunn weren't offered salary arbitration because their teams were afraid they WOULD accept. Teams don't pass up draft picks for no reason.
#10
Posted by Cory Humes, December 21, 2008 11:42 AM
As far as the Pirates affording this proposed 2010 payroll goes:
I would have LaRoche, Wilson, Sanchez, Grabow, Doumit and McLouth on their way out. Essentially, the remaining players would all be making at or near the league minimum. Let's say you get the 22 players not named Dunn, Garland and Abreu for $20 million combined.
Sign those three for $50 million (a large budget), and your Opening Day payroll is about $70 million. That drops by $7-8 million when you trade Garland at the All-Star break.
The Pirates can definitely afford a $70-80 million payroll if they're selling tickets (which these moves would do), and $62 million is realistic. Remember too that in 2010, the payroll drops much lower as Abreu walks -- down to $40-45 million or so.
The money's there to be spent as soon as the situation warrants it.
#11
Posted by Bob, December 21, 2008 12:47 PM
correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the Sox can trade Westmoreland since he'll be in his 1st year in the organization. Furthermore, I don't think that they would trade him seeing as he has the most upside of any of their young outfielders and is a hometown product. Ryan Kalish, Che Suan Lin, Pete Hissey are probably more likely to be included in a trade for Garland. Other than that, excellent ideas for turning the Pirates around.
#12
Posted by Cory Humes in reply to comment from Bob, December 21, 2008 1:48 PM
Westmoreland will be able to be traded in the timeframe I mentioned. Players aren't eligible in their first years -- you are correct. But as he was drafted and signed in 2008, he could be on the block mid-2009 (either explicitly named in a deal, or included as a PTBNL in a deal to be completed within sixth months).
I won't quibble over names -- you know the Sox system much better than I do -- but the theory's the same. Shoot for upside (and the players you mentioned fit the bill).
Thanks for the comment!












Leave a comment